Beyond Research Methods: Unpacking Ideological Criticism Through Ontology, Epistemology, and Ideographs

This chapter has four main sections that come together to demonstrate how ideological criticism can be used as a dynamic tool for social researchers rather than purely a research method. A roadmap and bridge are offered on how ontological, epistemological, and theoretical commitments can come together to complement the research method (i.e., Foss’s ideological criticism). The second section introduces the concept of ‘’ and underscores their roles in dissecting seemingly benevolent words. A particular emphasis will be on how the use of as can complement and offer an extra layer of rigour to the research technique in identifying the presented elements in Foss’s method (Rhetorical criticism: Exploration and practice. Waveland Press, 2009). The third section undertakes specific and more detailed consideration of Foss’s (Rhetorical criticism: Exploration and practice. Waveland Press, 2009) four-step approach to ‘ideology criticism’ complemented by . The fourth section provides a real-world example of how ‘Ideological Criticism’ was applied to our research, making data collection and analysis clear and explicit. The chapter concludes with a consideration of the boundaries and limitations of the research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Buy Now

eBook EUR 34.23 Price includes VAT (France)

Hardcover Book EUR 42.19 Price includes VAT (France)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

References

• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal,9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Browder, Z. (2018). Leadership during a crisis: An ideological criticism of the walking dead (Doctoral dissertation). Google Scholar
• Buescher, D., & Ono, K. (1996). Civilised colonialism: Pocahontas as neo-colonial rhetoric. Women’s Studies in Communication, 19, 127–154. http://www.cios.org/www/wommain.htm
• Coursera. (2015). Homepage. https://www.coursera.org/
• Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage. Google Scholar
• Dickinson, G., Ott, B. L., & Eric, A. (2005). Memory and myth at the Buffalo Bill Museum. Western Journal of Communication,69(2), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310500076684ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Foss, S. K. (2009). Rhetorical criticism: Exploration and practice. Waveland Press. Google Scholar
• Friesen, N. (2008). Critical theory: Ideology critique and the myths of e-learning. Ubiquity, 2. https://doi.org/10.1145/1386858.1386860
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research 2(163–194), 105. Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1978). A postscript to knowledge and human interests. Philosophy of the Social Sciences,3, 157–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839317300300111ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Hamlyn, D. W. (1995). Epistemology, history of. In The Oxford companion to philosophy (pp. 242–245). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press. BookGoogle Scholar
• Heywood, J. (2018). The scholar academic ideology of the disciplines. In J. Heywood (Ed.), Empowering professional teaching in engineering: Sustaining the scholarship of teaching (pp. 87–107). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-79382-0_7
• Lange, A. (2021). The Twitter of Donald J. Trump during an age of uncertainty: The COVID-19 pandemic. UWL Journal of Undergraduate Research, XXIV. Google Scholar
• Lim, L. (2014). Ideology, rationality, and reproduction in education: A critical discourse analysis. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2012.739467
• Love, N. S. (1998). Dogmas and dreams: A reader in modern political ideologies. Chatham House Pub. Google Scholar
• McGee, M. C. (1980). The “ideograph”: A link between rhetoric and ideology. Quarterly Journal of Speech,66(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638009383499ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Ndiaye, K. (2004). Cyber ideology: An ideological criticism of the UNICEF, UNAIDS, and UNFPA web sites (pp. 272–279). Waveland Press. Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. F. (2009). The unaddressed “I” of ideology critique. Power and Education, 1(2), 189–200. http://www.csics.educ.ubc.ca/Projects/4_Pinar_POWER_1_2_web.pdf
• Udacity. (2014). Homepage. Udacity. https://www.udacity.com/

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Education Strategy, Charles Darwin University, Brinkin, NT, Australia Seb Dianati

1. Seb Dianati

Corresponding author

Rights and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dianati, S. (2024). Beyond Research Methods: Unpacking Ideological Criticism Through Ontology, Epistemology, and Ideographs. In: The Commercialisation of Massive Open Online Courses. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58184-7_4

Download citation

• .RIS
• .ENW
• .BIB

• DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58184-7_4
• Published : 14 May 2024
• Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
• Print ISBN : 978-3-031-58183-0
• Online ISBN : 978-3-031-58184-7
• eBook Packages : EducationEducation (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Get shareable link

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Copy to clipboard

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative